Frutilla

General

Category
Free
Tag
TDD & BDD
License
MIT License
Registered
Sep 7, 2015
Favorites
0
Link
https://github.com/ignaciotcrespo/frutilla
See also
Cucumber
JsonUnit
JBehave
JGiven
lint-junit-rule

Additional

Language
Java
Version
N/A
Created
Aug 15, 2015
Updated
Aug 8, 2016 (Retired)
Owner
Ignacio Tomas Crespo (ignaciotcrespo)
Contributors
Ignacio Tomas Crespo (ignaciotcrespo)
ngtignacio
2
Activity
Badge
Generate
Download
Source code
APK file

Commercial

![build status](https://img.shields.io/badge/build-info =>-yellow.svg)

Frutilla 0.7.1

UPDATE: this started as an experiment in my projects and I received a lot of nice feedback about it, positive and negative. I love all the technical knowledge I exchanged with many of you. This project is deprecated now, after a long technical session I agree the best way to see useful information in the UT is to add detailed messages in the assertions. I will change Frutilla, analyzing how to generate a report extracting the javadocs directly from the source of the tests.

Frutilla lets java software development teams describe the tests in plain text, and link them to the specifications.

I like the Cucumber way to describe tests using GIVEN + WHEN + THEN sentences, and I think JUnit needs something to help UT to be more descriptive. Cucumber has a java API but I think it is very complex to use, linking sentences to java methods. Creating a UT should be a simple task.

Tests must be readable and less lines of code is better. I really appreciate a self descriptive test, you know exactly the use case in seconds. It doesnt matter if it is a small unit test or an integration test, a proper description is always welcome. The problem I have found is the readable code can not be read in the test reports, and sometimes the reports are opened by people without access to the code, or you as developer received a report but temporary dont have access to the code.

Also sometimes I really appreciate a javadoc in top of a UT describing what is being tested, some tests are hard to write in a readable way, could be due to the poor architecture of the current code. The same disadvantage than before, a javadoc cant be included in the .class file.

I created 2 ways or flavors of adding descriptions that will be included in the compiled classes: with annotations and with JUnit rules.

Flavor 1: Annotations

Using annotations needs a specific runner and looks like the following:

    @RunWith(value = org.frutilla.FrutillaTestRunner.class)
    public class FrutillaExamplesWithAnnotationTest {
    
        @Frutilla(
            Given = "a test with Frutilla annotations",
            When = "it fails due to an error",
            Then = "it shows the test description in the stacktrace"
        )
        @Test
        public void testError() {
            throw new RuntimeException("forced error");
        }
        
    }

It supports also adding AND sentences on every block GIVEN, WHEN or THEN.

One advantage of using annotations is they can be collapsed by default, and the test in your IDE will be

    @{...}
    public void testError() {
        throw new RuntimeException("forced error");
    }

Flavor 2: JUnit rules

In case annotations is not your cup of tea I included a way to do it using the powerful JUnit rules. In this case there is no need to run with FrutillaTestRunner, but the rule needs to be declared.

    public class FrutillaExamplesWithRuleTest {

      @Rule
      public FrutillaRule mScenario = new FrutillaRule();
      
      @Test
      public void testError() throws Exception {
        mScenario.given("a test with Frutilla rule")
                .when("it fails due to and error")
                .then("it shows the test description in the stacktrace").end();

        throw new RuntimeException("forced exception");
      }

I see pretty invasive to include the description inside the test, but the alternative is there for you if you like it. Another disadvantage is you can not collapse the descriptions block.

The stacktrace in the reports

What I added to test reports is the description in top of the stacktrace errors. I dont care the tests that passed, I care about those that failed, and I want to know fast what is the problem. Using Frutilla the stacktrace looks like this:

java.lang.RuntimeException:
[
GIVEN a test with Frutilla annotations
WHEN it fails due to an error
THEN it shows the test description in the stacktrace
]
[
Message: forced error
]
at org.frutilla.android.FrutillaExamplesWithAnnotationTest.testError(FrutillaExamplesWithAnnotationTest.java:38)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:511)
...

It is helpful to see those descriptions in CI servers like jenkins. I really hate to see a failed UT in jenkins and start searching for it in the code to understand what is doing due to the name is something like "testParsingDataValidWhenNoUser". WTF, that method name can be a hundred of things. What is the data? Why is not valid? And more. With the proper description I know exactly what is failing, and if the descriptions are linked to the specifications then we are 1 click of knowing the complete scenario to understand the problem.

Android

Frutilla can be used also in Android using the excellent JUnit4 instrumentation runner AndroidJUnitRunner

Add it in gradle using:

androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test:runner:0.3'

and add the instrumentation in your manifest

    <instrumentation
    android:name="android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
    android:targetPackage="org.frutilla"/>

Installation

Use the group id for maven and gradle, e.g.:

    testCompile 'com.github.ignaciotcrespo:frutilla:0.7.1'

Frutilla is still in development, but functional. I appreciate your feedback to itcrespo@gmail.com

Pending: